The GHK-Cu Guide
Back to the reading collection

THE GHK-CU GUIDE / SOURCE INDEX

Copper chemistry, skin models and human evidence.

A copper-binding experiment, a fibroblast assay, an ex-vivo skin test and a study in people are distinct pieces of evidence. This focused bibliography follows the original papers cited in the GHK-Cu guide rather than treating them as interchangeable demonstrations of benefit.

Use the related article to see why each paper is included. Keep the tested material, formulation, route and measured endpoint attached to the finding. A topical observation does not automatically establish an effect for another product or route.

6 distinct original-paper links cited across 3 guides in this edition. Each link is counted once, even when several articles cite it.

Showing 6 of 6 original-paper links.

GHK-Cu
Original publication

Trapaidze et al. (2012): Copper binding to GHK and DAHK (opens the original source in a new tab)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Open the original paper (opens in a new tab)

WHY THIS SOURCE IS HERE

GHK-Cu
Original publication

Bossak-Ahmad et al. (2020): Ternary GHK–copper–urocanic-acid complex (opens the original source in a new tab)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Open the original paper (opens in a new tab)

WHY THIS SOURCE IS HERE

GHK-Cu1988
Preclinical

Stimulation of collagen synthesis in fibroblast cultures by the tripeptide-copper complex glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine-Cu2+ (opens the original source in a new tab)

FEBS Letters

Design
In vitro experiment measuring collagen synthesis in cultured fibroblasts exposed to GHK-Cu.
Population / setting
Fibroblast cultures; no people were treated. The abstract does not provide the number of experimental replicates.
Sample size
Not specified in this summary; consult the paper.

What was observed
GHK-Cu increased collagen synthesis in fibroblast cultures independently of a change in cell number. This supplies a mechanistic observation, not a measured clinical improvement in human skin.

Keep in view
Cell-culture findings cannot establish the benefit or safety of a serum, cream or injectable product. The abstract does not justify a universal percentage increase in collagen or a claim about wrinkles, wound healing or hair growth in people.

Open the original paper (opens in a new tab)

WHY THIS SOURCE IS HERE

GHK-Cu
Original publication

Miller et al. (2006): Randomized study after CO2 laser resurfacing (opens the original source in a new tab)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Open the original paper (opens in a new tab)

WHY THIS SOURCE IS HERE

Preparing your reading window…